For physicians & nurse practitioners
You stay the clinician. That is not a slogan, it is the architecture.
Every question a physician asks about clinical AI comes down to authority: what is it allowed to do without me? Here is the answer, in the order you would ask it.

The boundary
Drafting is delegated. Deciding is not.
The software is permitted to read, rank, and draft. It is not permitted to release anything to a patient, a chart, or a payer. That line is enforced in code, not in policy.
Delegated to the software
- Screening the panel for program eligibility
- Drafting the order with qualifying diagnoses attached
- Drafting outreach and clinical notes
- Ranking who needs attention and why
- Counting transmission days and accruing time logs
- Assembling the evidence file and preparing the claim
Reserved to you
- Signing every order
- Every diagnosis and every change to a plan
- Every medication decision
- Whether a patient is appropriate to enroll at all
- Signing the clinical documentation
- Submitting the claim under your NPI
Every action that touches a patient, a chart, or a claim has a named human attached to it, with a timestamp — and the record of who rejected a draft is kept as carefully as the record of who approved one.
Your actual workflow
Three things arrive in your queue
Not a dashboard to monitor. A finite list that empties.
- 01
Orders to sign
A drafted enrollment order with the qualifying diagnoses, the program, and the eligibility logic shown. Edit any field, sign it, or reject it with a reason.
Nothing ships or enrolls before this.
- 02
Escalations to judge
Readings that crossed a threshold you set, with trend context and the drafted outreach attached. You decide what happens; the software drafted a suggestion.
Thresholds are configurable per practice.
- 03
Documentation to attest
Monthly notes drafted from the work actually performed, with time logs and the interactive-communication record already assembled. Read, amend, sign.
This is what an auditor reads later.
The clinical case
The reason to do this is not the billing code.
Chronic disease is managed in the 51 weeks a year the patient is not in your office, and you currently have almost no visibility into those weeks. That is the actual problem. The reimbursement is what makes solving it survivable for a small practice.
A hypertensive patient whose readings drift upward for three weeks is a patient you would want to hear about in week one. Right now you hear about it at the next scheduled visit, or in an emergency department note.
A patient discharged on Thursday is a patient someone should call by Monday. In most small practices, nobody does — not through negligence, but because the discharge fax landed in a pile and the day filled up.
Those are operational failures, not clinical ones. They are the kind of failure software is genuinely good at removing.
Between-visit visibility you do not currently have
Continuous device data on the patients where it changes management, surfaced as tasks rather than as a chart you have to go look at.
Transitions caught inside the window
Post-discharge and post-emergency follow-up flagged against the deadline that matters, with the outreach already drafted.
The panel view, not just the patient in the room
Care gaps and risk stratification across everyone, which is also an APCM requirement in its own right.
A documented reason for every enrollment
If a patient is not a good candidate for monitoring, the honest answer is not to enroll them. The software is built to let you say that and record why.
Clinician questions
Asked in roughly this order
How much of my day does this take?
Am I signing something I did not read?
What does supervision look like here?
What if I disagree with how the software triaged a patient?
Does the model see my patients' identities?
What is my exposure if a claim is questioned?
Also worth reading: the version for your practice manager, who will be running most of this.
Thirty minutes, none of it yours
The panel scan runs with your practice manager and needs no clinician time. If what comes back is interesting, that is when a conversation with you is worth having.
No EHR change. No commitment.